Posted by Nameless Poseur On 2011-07-08 13:57:24There were actually two (2) additional musicians, not three: bassist and keyboardist who rocked a wicked Farfisa organ. Check your facts Exclaim.
Posted by Anupa On 2011-07-08 14:26:14Thanks Nameless Poseur. I blame a shitty line of sight and poor note-taking while having too much fun.
Posted by Nameless Poseur On 2011-07-12 09:43:06But if your JOB is to review this concert, shouldn't you be taking better notes? It's a music magazine, after all. And I'm sure you could 'have fun' while still paying attention to what's going on onstage.
Posted by NPlz On 2011-07-12 15:35:55re: Nameless Poseur
Stop tripping on your indie rock prick over a simple error. I'd rather a description of how well the songs were performed than an anal listing of logistics. The reviewer even corrected the oversight.
Hope you're creaming yourself on being the most authentic fan of musical performance in the history of vibrating air particles.
Posted by TheChief On 2011-07-12 16:30:53This issue speaks to the core of Exclaim! actually. As one of the primary recruiters of new writers, I get a lot of pitches from "journalists" and journalism students eager to take assignments. They're often fine writers and competent journalists. But I'm not all that interested in competent writers who will approach music as an "assignment" - I'm much more interested in serious, dedicated, lifelong music fans who can write beautifully, like Anupa.
I will take 100 little factual errors from someone who's super excited to see a show over a "journalist" who takes an assignment but has to look at wikipedia to even figure out who they're seeing.
As an team, Exclaim! can help anyone become a better writer than they are. It's one of our mission statements and one of the proudest legacies we have at the magazine.
But what I can't do is make someone more enthusiastic about music - that's a passion that has to come from them.